Hi,
the method used in the most recent version of the Excel file (December 2014), for the pro-rata calculation of number of tetrads to record in part hectads, somewhat inflated the number of tetrads to be recorded. I have therefore changed the calculation method. A graphic showing how numbers of tetrads per part hectad will be calculated for different targets is shown in the Analysis worksheet.
Previous versions of the Excel file, included all tetrads, no matter how small the area in a vice-county, when carrying out calculations of numbers of tetrads to record. Especially where a vc has a long and complex boundary, this also tended to inflate the calculated number of tetrads to record. I have therefore modified the Analysis worksheet to give two sets of results. One, that meets a 'Low threshold' and the other that meets a 'High threshold'.
The Low threshold is: Target number of tetrads to survey for 'well recorded hectad' is based on number of tetrads in hectad with
at least 1km2 of land & fresh water in the vice-county.
The High threshold is: Target number of tetrads to survey for 'well recorded hectad' is based on number of tetrads in hectad,
irrespective of area of land & fresh water in the vice-county.
The hectad summary table on the Analysis sheet now has two colours of conditional formatting, distinguishing hectads that meet the Low cf High thresholds.
I have updated the 'Read this' worksheet to reflect these changes.
The link to download the latest version of the Excel file is:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/404 ... le%29.xlsxPlease download the file, and experiment with varying the three input parameters (cells R3, R4 and R6 on the Analysis worksheet), to see what effect changes have. Then substitute the current vc94 data with that for your vc, or a vc of interest. The file is a tool to assist with planning field work and assessing progress towards Atlas 2020, so please vary the input parameters and interpret outputs to best meet your requirements.
Andy.